Sorry but is it just me, has the question about the image on the auction accurately portraying the poster's colours been categorically answered?
I totally understand the overall condition is fantastic but the representation on the auction looks like one of those beauty adverts in a magazine, all manipulated, saturated and tweaked (nothing like what the model actually looks like in real life and still different to the original photograph). You can see no paper texture, no difference in the matt'ness (not sure if that's a word) of the inks.
I know I'm not a 'vintage' poster collector and have never dealt with restoration, but the two images below strike me as very different. If (and that's a 'never' if) I was in the position to buy a poster like this I would be perturbed about the over-worked photo on the auction, to me it doesn't actually look like a photo!
Suppose my real question is why don't Heritage take a high quality photo of the poster like emovieposter does that shows (with much more accuracy) the real colours of the poster? For example the red of the main 'Dracula' type in the auction image is perfect spanking red, I would be amazed if it looked like that in real life.
All answers, abuse, people telling me I don't know what I'm talking about readily accepted.
Same Drac poster. Pre-restore and online catalog images: