|
Dread_Pirate_Mel
|
 |
« Reply #125 on: November 05, 2010, 09:06:21 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 10:14:05 PM by Dread_Pirate_Mel »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
brude
|
|
« Reply #126 on: November 05, 2010, 09:12:11 PM » |
|
Lookin' good, dude....  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tstatum
|
|
« Reply #127 on: November 06, 2010, 01:27:37 AM » |
|
How can you not love it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Caul
|
|
« Reply #129 on: November 06, 2010, 07:20:39 PM » |
|
Looking good Mel! Now, about those Connerys...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dread_Pirate_Mel
|
|
« Reply #130 on: November 06, 2010, 07:45:20 PM » |
|
Now, about those Connerys...
When you got a job to do
You gotta do it well
You gotta give the other fellow helllllll...."Those Connerys and frames cost me $2,000. Should I spend another $2,000 acquiring all originals or should I spent it finding my own Pussy Galore? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
50s
|
|
« Reply #131 on: November 06, 2010, 09:49:26 PM » |
|
Harry... you are responsible for that... that... that shocker  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Caul
|
|
« Reply #133 on: November 06, 2010, 11:23:08 PM » |
|
And the rest! Whew! 49 Bond posters up on the wall - not too shabby. Now I've got to throw a James Bond party this month. Any ideas?
I would recommend martinis and a bunch of hot, easy women. And it will pain you to do, but you should probably invite your nemesis too... you know, so you can have a nice respectable chat with them. Do you expect me to talk? Ha, ha, ha... no mister Mel, I expect you to die! Nice Connery's by the way! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
supraman079
|
|
« Reply #134 on: November 07, 2010, 10:52:03 AM » |
|
How long does it take you to change out 49 posters? Can't you find a small place for one insert poster to make it an even 50?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 07, 2010, 12:51:08 PM by supraman079 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cj
|
|
« Reply #135 on: November 07, 2010, 12:23:05 PM » |
|
Nice Bond Posters Mel! I was looking at your "50 years of bond" poster (very well put together) and to make it 50 years shouldn't it be 2012?
Cj
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dread_Pirate_Mel
|
|
« Reply #136 on: November 07, 2010, 03:38:52 PM » |
|
CJ: "1962 - 2011" - probably messed that up - I was thinking Dr. No was released in early 1962 but it was actually Oct 1962 in UK and May 1963 in US - really just looking for an excuse for a "50th" anniversary poster
Chad: 49 posters - I ran out of 41" frames, thwarting my evil plan
Harry: Yes, I'm all for your party plan! Gotta rent that white tux...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Caul
|
|
« Reply #137 on: November 07, 2010, 07:22:05 PM » |
|
Harry: Yes, I'm all for your party plan! Gotta rent that white tux...
BLACK, Mel... a Black Tux. If you wear a white tux you'll look like a waiter...   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dread_Pirate_Mel
|
|
« Reply #139 on: November 08, 2010, 11:51:31 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 09, 2010, 12:23:10 AM by Dread_Pirate_Mel »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
the-jace
|
|
« Reply #140 on: November 09, 2010, 10:08:48 AM » |
|
Just had to throw that Jackie Brown in my face, didnt you :p
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dread_Pirate_Mel
|
|
« Reply #141 on: November 11, 2010, 12:45:08 PM » |
|
The advance withdrawn and regular Pulp Fiction posters side by side. I've carefully checked my advance poster and I'm 100% convinced it is original. It meets every test on MPA perfectly - size, color, etc. I can't really say which I prefer. The replacement poster has brighter colors and Thurman has a lighter, more "life like" skin tone. However, the withdrawn shows the whole body, the credits are less intrusive, and the gun is less prominent. Which do you prefer?   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
brude
|
|
« Reply #142 on: November 11, 2010, 12:54:05 PM » |
|
I prefer the regular for a few reasons:
a) brighter color
b) I like the actors' names stacked on the left
c) logo typography
d) pistol prominence
e) full credits
..ohhh, and did I mention the price?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
the-jace
|
|
« Reply #143 on: November 11, 2010, 02:07:54 PM » |
|
I'm shocked to say this, but I like the replacement better now that I've seen them side by side.
I should add, that I am in no way biased by the fact that I own the replacement and cannot afford the recalled ;-)
But yeah, the gun looks better on the replacement and as brude just said, the actors names are more prominent on the second one.
I'm still jealous though :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
supraman079
|
|
« Reply #144 on: November 11, 2010, 03:22:10 PM » |
|
I think the gun looks more fake to me on the replacement even though you can see it better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juli
|
|
« Reply #146 on: December 01, 2010, 11:00:08 PM » |
|
The more the merrier - just received a mint rolled Pulp Fiction advance dictionary
Very nice. One of my all time favorite movies and posters (all three of them I love). ~ Juli |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I am desperately looking for a Steven Spielberg signed letter (especially with Schindler's List content). If you have one I will make you an offer you can't refuse.
|
|
|
|
Harry Caul
|
|
« Reply #147 on: December 01, 2010, 11:46:11 PM » |
|
Looking good! So did you decide not to sell your regular style?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dread_Pirate_Mel
|
|
« Reply #148 on: December 02, 2010, 07:35:16 AM » |
|
Looking good! So did you decide not to sell your regular style?
Naah, I decided I like triplets:  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Caul
|
|
« Reply #149 on: December 02, 2010, 08:07:16 AM » |
|
You are so fucked Mel. Once you've crossed the "I'll sell this one so I can buy that one" line it is all down hill from there... Welcome to the club, by the way |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
