That was a post obviously made in jest in the HITCG thread, the board's not-particularly-serious smut thread. I'm flummoxed anyone took that seriously for a second. In all likelihood only two or three people took it seriously and everyone else straying into that den of iniquity instantly recognized it as a not-so-serious post. But some ingenious (or perhaps ridiculous) detective work - including an X-ray! - later "showed" it to be fake!
But anyway I'm glad you two are very concerned for the "sake of the newbies" hanging out in the smut thread! I'll be sure to make all proper "disclaimers" there in the future, lest they be led astray.
And since you are insinuating that I've somehow posted a photoshopped Attack poster, perhaps you should check here. Of course, you could have easily found that 40x60 poster yourself before you made the prior posts, couldn't you?
First, I did not hint at or insinuate that there was any photoshopping done on the 40x60
ATTACK poster by anyone. I located and looked at the image on Heritage before replying here. Please go back and read my response. I said that posters of other sizes have utilized the same artwork, sometimes with subtle changes done to it. Case in point: I followed by posting an additional response and an image of the
ATTACK UK quad. This image is also smokeless, further bolstering my previous comment.
If you choose to be flummoxed, that is your choice. The initial
GOLDFINGER query was a simple question initially and all that was needed was a simple response. Since no answer was forthcoming, it certainly raised questions in other people's minds. If a fake poster had been posted to the board, without explanation, by someone else, I am sure there would have been questions or comments put forth by you and others.
To inquire makes sound, common sense, in a hobby littered with reproes, re-strikes and bootlegs.
