Ok guys, if it was any other seller you wouldnt give two shits, but since its Bruce you need to have carbon dating on the poster and verification from the president of marketing for Warner Brothers in 1983.
bullshit Dale. It seems that posters are questioned all the time. If someone sells 3000 items a week, there are potentially more often a question than someone selling 10% of that weekly
people are always questioning Dave's prices, Heritage's descriptions, ebay sellers etc.. so tell me, what makes anyone immune to questions? Hell, in his own promo post today he's insinuating that other databases are dishonest, are you critiquing his critique?
there is another reality - maybe the question just could have been answered and that would have ended the conversation. Boom.
Instead, the question was ignored and I hate to tell you, that is exactly the kind of response that puts wood on the fire
I have seen many commercial posters over time the same size as regular movie posters. One producer of Frazetta print posters only used that size. I have reprint posters in my stock that are 27x41, on the same paper as regular posters and no markings to state they are repros, but they came from a repro producer.
Size alone, paper alone IS NOT proof of anything.
If it's a theatrical poster, there should be evidence of it being a theatrical poster and if someone asks - and I am far from the first person to want to know in this thread - and you came here to posit helpful information, exactly what is the problem with actually positing the requested reply? Especially if not posting the answer is going to look unseemly?