I don't know why, but you seem to attract trouble.
Send me a lottery ticket, with your luck I will win.
I do don't i?
And only if we go 50/50.
Oh and here's my response:
"***I don't understand why this case has been opened.*** I said for you to return it but for the poster to arrive in the same condition it has left you it has to be packed correctly, (The way it was mailed to you) otherwise it will get damaged and i will be unable to verify the marking you speak of.*** If you don't pack it like i ask and send it back to me, we can go no further.*** The poster is new, undamaged and taken from a roll of what was, fifty posters right from the manufacturer. As soon as i checked it, it was wrapped with tissue paper and bubble wrap and placed in the tube for delivery. The damage you speak of was not visible then but the red mark you mention is a print bleed and is on them all, like i said before.** The posters (Image) resolution is poor yes, but this is the design, it's how it's meant to look as the artwork is from the 1927 original for the film. (It says that on the poster) The new parts of the poster, the title and text etc are crisp and clear.
As for the paper quality it is the same paper that is used for most uk quads except where they use the thick paper stock. I have some of 'The Dark Knight Rises' posters here and the paper feels identical. To say that it is like a photo copy is not true. Do you realise how hard it is to copy a film poster with a matching reverse image on the back? ** I asked you for a photo of the damaged area so i could choose which route to take via redelivery but you refused saying that i was basically calling you a liar. This is not the case, it's simply a way of dealing with the problem faster than having you return it to me. I have used this method previously and no one has complained till now.** Finally i don't appreciate being called to defend myself on ebay or being called untrustworthy by someone who obviously doesn't know the history of the item they are buying.
SCHOOLED!!!
