Author Topic: Australian Vs American  (Read 151382 times)

ozcinemagic

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #425 on: March 28, 2013, 11:32:46 PM »
Aussie >>>



USA >>>  eyeroll



Matt

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #426 on: March 28, 2013, 11:44:19 PM »
Mark, don't rub it in...I'm starting to feel sorry for the Yanks.


Hmmm, that was a short lived emotion. eyeroll2

Offline CSM

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 12567
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #427 on: March 28, 2013, 11:46:20 PM »
Ravenous alligators!?  Villainous Wily Orientals?!
Chris

ozcinemagic

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #428 on: March 28, 2013, 11:52:51 PM »
Advanced US artist working in colour >>>


ozcinemagic

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #429 on: March 28, 2013, 11:54:54 PM »
Ravenous alligators!?  Villainous Wily Orientals?!

High-camp???
Worse than Top Gun!  ;)

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #430 on: March 29, 2013, 03:01:37 AM »
US - 3
Aus - 0

 ;)


Dunkirk (MGM)

 




Son Of Dr Jekyll (Columbia):
   



Irma la Douce (UA)

Why does the AUS version have Shirley MacLaine's mouth off to the right side of her face? Come on! LOL.

 
« Last Edit: March 29, 2013, 03:08:04 AM by erik1925 »


-Jeff

ozcinemagic

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #431 on: March 29, 2013, 06:46:50 AM »
US - 3
Aus - 0

 ;)

US guys getting desperate now. Comparing RR daybills to 1/2 shts & 1 shts!

ozcinemagic

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #432 on: March 29, 2013, 07:25:30 AM »
Aussie: creative, colourful, playful, visually appealing.



US: photographic, uninspired & generally drab. Same story everywhere!


Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #433 on: March 29, 2013, 01:12:13 PM »
In the above example, the Aus has done nothing original except to (poorly) trace the original photographic elements of the US insert (what did they do to Crosby's face?) No artwork is ever original.  And when left to their own devices, they come up with things like the Dunkirk example, (RR or not).  :P

As far as comparing daybills to OS art, the Son of Jekyll artistic/photographic elements are identical, so even better. It's one of best ways to compare and show how Aus artists often couldn't even get those right, altering and "child-fying" their copied US counterparts.  ;D 

Round 3.

Your turn.   wynk


-Jeff

ozcinemagic

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #434 on: March 29, 2013, 04:37:26 PM »
No artwork is ever original. 

WTF?????????????

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9038
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #435 on: March 29, 2013, 05:00:11 PM »
Ditto...????
It's more than a Hobby...

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #436 on: March 29, 2013, 05:23:58 PM »

No artwork is ever original.



I'm sorry.. I take that back.

Much of the Aus artwork is, indeed, very "original."  pcorn

I like how Robin on the Aus daybill above, was (re)drawn as though he were all of 3 feet 1 inch tall (an early incarnation of Mini-Me, maybe?)  ;D

« Last Edit: March 29, 2013, 05:24:39 PM by erik1925 »


-Jeff

Offline stewart boyle

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 3270
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #437 on: March 29, 2013, 05:30:10 PM »
cheers

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
« Last Edit: March 29, 2013, 05:35:02 PM by erik1925 »


-Jeff

Matt

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #439 on: March 29, 2013, 08:44:43 PM »

Your turn.   wynk


Ok Sunny Jim, let's actually compare a RR to a RR...apples to apples...

In this case the apple>>>
                                   

and the lemon>>>
                           

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #440 on: March 29, 2013, 08:49:20 PM »
Why is Fred Gwynne on the Aussie version?  And why are his eyes TWO different colors? Maybe it was supposed to be David Bowie? (and long before Bowie was even around).. amazing!!  eyeroll   laugh1

« Last Edit: March 29, 2013, 08:52:37 PM by erik1925 »


-Jeff

Matt

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #441 on: March 29, 2013, 09:01:56 PM »
The Aussie Fred was on the piss the night before, anyone can see that!

Just one small question, why isn't Fred MacMurray on the US version? eyeroll

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #442 on: March 29, 2013, 09:05:44 PM »
He's Front and center.  ;)

Understandable, tho, since I'm thinking you guys dont even know who Fred MacMurray is.  8)

Have they aired My Three Sons there yet?  :-\

And you havent explained why the Aus version has him with multi-colored irises, either.. i didnt say they were red... laugh1


« Last Edit: March 29, 2013, 09:07:11 PM by erik1925 »


-Jeff

Matt

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #443 on: March 29, 2013, 09:19:07 PM »
Have they aired My Three Sons there yet?  :-\

Yeah, but while you were watching that, we were watching I Dream of Jeannie.

And you havent explained why the Aus version has him with multi-colored irises, either.. i didnt say they were red... laugh1

That's easy...you've never drunk real Aussie beer!

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #444 on: March 29, 2013, 09:28:26 PM »


More 5 year old art class results:  :o


And then:  ;D:


-Jeff

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #445 on: March 29, 2013, 09:45:00 PM »
Again.. what did they do to his face?!?! I dont think this is a horror flick. Maybe that woman (is that a woman on the lower left?) thinks so.  ;)




Much better:  8)





-Jeff

Matt

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #446 on: March 29, 2013, 09:51:12 PM »




Couldn't find a pic of the insert, they must of given up after the one sheet.

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #447 on: March 29, 2013, 09:59:22 PM »
So first I get bitched at for using a one sheet as a comparison.. and, mind you, it had THE SAME ART! What makes you think you can do an about face and pull a 180? And with completely different art. Play by the rules.   nono

I hardly think the toy plane depicted on the AUS daybill will do much harm. I'm more afraid of the he/she in the corner (or is that Ellie Mae Clampett?) -- in any case, the one with the long butter knife.

 laugh1

« Last Edit: March 29, 2013, 10:11:43 PM by erik1925 »


-Jeff

Offline brude

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 13565
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #448 on: March 29, 2013, 10:25:07 PM »
Jeff does have a point. 
When you compare this Betty Boop-style daybill ( wynk) with the Zoe Mozert-inspired RR one-sheet art it was lifted from, there is no comparison.



Matt

  • Guest
Re: Australian Vs American
« Reply #449 on: March 29, 2013, 10:40:18 PM »
So first I get bitched at for using a one sheet as a comparison.. and, mind you, it had THE SAME ART! What makes you think you can do an about face and pull a 180? And with completely different art. Play by the rules.   nono

I hardly think the toy plane depicted on the AUS daybill will do much harm. I'm more afraid of the he/she in the corner (or is that Ellie Mae Clampett?) -- in any case, the one with the long butter knife.



Whinge, whinge, whinge, that's all you do. Play by the rules. It's War. There are no rules. If you can't stand the heat then go back to your sandbox and play with the other little kiddies. Our children are at work designing artwork, so you can't play with them.

What...don't you guys have foot long curved butter knifes?

Ted, style vs inspired...what a you a journalist now? Was Jane's nose inspired by SJP? You could park a Sherman Tank up there.

Move over Jeff, Ted wants some room in your sandbox. :P

« Last Edit: March 29, 2013, 10:43:18 PM by Matt »