« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53 ... 88   Go Down

Author Topic: James Bond  (Read 628985 times)

Online 50s

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5631
  • Steve
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1250 on: September 28, 2013, 04:21:18 AM »
What is going on?

Logged

Offline Simes

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2870
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1251 on: September 28, 2013, 05:57:47 AM »
!

Virtual acquisition?  I was under the impression you wanted digitised images of original posters that were actually printed...?  The above was never a quad...

Moving right along...
Logged

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1252 on: September 28, 2013, 12:25:27 PM »
Logged


-Jeff

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1253 on: September 28, 2013, 03:04:35 PM »
Very odd, Simes and Steve, this whole virtual gallery thing.

Anyway, I have never seen that dated quad.
Those Bond books are notorious for including images of posters and models that were never printed or made.

Andyvee, I don't think anybody on this forum says they are experts.
Most of us are collectors, some collectors and dealers and some just post when they want to sell something.
Logged
Best wishes,
Adam

Offline ladeda

  • Hobbyist
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1254 on: September 28, 2013, 06:01:38 PM »
Is an online archive really that strange?

No need to treat the guy like a pirhana. jsyk. eyeroll
Logged

Offline Silence

  • Hobbyist
  • **
  • Posts: 140
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1255 on: September 28, 2013, 07:04:06 PM »
Searching for something in the closet today and found this one.

Michael

Logged
MICHAEL

Online 50s

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5631
  • Steve
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1256 on: September 28, 2013, 07:04:46 PM »

Quote from: ladeda on September 28, 2013, 06:01:38 PM
No need to treat the guy like a pirhana.


?



Logged

Offline ladeda

  • Hobbyist
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1257 on: September 28, 2013, 07:09:18 PM »
Quote from: 50s on September 28, 2013, 07:04:46 PM

?


jfc, fuck, fucck. I meant, PARIAH.

I've been drinking. I'm on meds. juggling two babies. leave me alone. :-[
« Last Edit: September 28, 2013, 07:09:39 PM by ladeda »
Logged

andyvee

  • Guest
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1258 on: September 29, 2013, 12:52:50 AM »
Quote from: bondposters on September 28, 2013, 03:04:35 PM

Anyway, I have never seen that dated quad.
Those Bond books are notorious for including images of posters and models that were never printed or made.


Sorry if I misled you and Simes. That picture is not about a quad or a poster, it is a prop from Octopussy, a real sign. I found the image in the internet, liked it and did some Photoshop in it, just for fun. When I said "acquisition" I just meant that I had found the picture online, it was a joke. Sorry.
Logged

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1259 on: September 30, 2013, 01:50:49 PM »
Quote from: Silence on September 28, 2013, 07:04:06 PM
Searching for something in the closet today and found this one.

Lol. As you do!
But do you still like it, Michael?
Logged
Best wishes,
Adam

Offline Harry Caul

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5885
    • Marquee Poster
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1260 on: October 04, 2013, 11:12:54 AM »
Quote from: Simes on November 23, 2012, 10:57:28 AM
A purchase just came through this morning, but I daren't place it alongside the art in the November thread.  (Which probably says more about me than the poster)

Suffice to say, it is at least a quad.




So if there were Odeon-specific quads for DAD and Skyfall, does it stand to reason that there are also Odeon posters for CR and QoS? 




How many quads does that make now?  :)
« Last Edit: October 04, 2013, 11:14:00 AM by Harry Caul »
Logged

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9039
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1261 on: October 04, 2013, 11:54:38 AM »
I have a few of these teasers for non-Bond films, so my guess is, there is likely one for all the films the Odeon released in recent times..
Logged
It's more than a Hobby...

Offline Harry Caul

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5885
    • Marquee Poster
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1262 on: October 04, 2013, 12:37:33 PM »
Yes, I've seen them for quite a few "blockbuster" films...

Sigh. 
Logged

Offline skyjackers

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1006
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1263 on: October 04, 2013, 12:43:11 PM »
Is that a good thing? I have a few, but none are for Bond movies unfortunately.
Logged

Offline stewart boyle

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 3270
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1264 on: October 04, 2013, 12:43:50 PM »
It`s an Imax poster,that does make it a tad interesting...

Stew
Logged

Offline Simes

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2870
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1265 on: October 04, 2013, 02:10:43 PM »
Quote from: Harry Caul on October 04, 2013, 11:12:54 AM
So if there were Odeon-specific quads for DAD and Skyfall, does it stand to reason that there are also Odeon posters for CR and QoS? 




How many quads does that make now?  :)

My turn..

Oh for fucks sake - another crappy Die Another Day poster to collect.   moron1

Never seen that before.
Logged

Offline stewart boyle

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 3270
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1266 on: October 04, 2013, 02:16:39 PM »
Quote from: Simes on October 04, 2013, 02:10:43 PM
O fr fs   sake - another crappy Die Another Day poster to collect.   moron1
  ;D
Logged

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9039
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1267 on: October 04, 2013, 02:23:45 PM »
You Completists.... ;)
Logged
It's more than a Hobby...

Offline Simes

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2870
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1268 on: October 04, 2013, 02:39:45 PM »
Yeah.

Believe me, I don't win friends with this...
Logged

Offline skyjackers

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1006
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1269 on: October 05, 2013, 06:11:24 PM »
Quote from: paul waines on October 04, 2013, 02:23:45 PM
You Completists.... ;)

I don't think a Completist can ever truly be complete, speaking from my own experience of course  ;D
Logged

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1270 on: October 07, 2013, 09:58:49 AM »
I feel like Simes...
Though I don't have either of those quads lol!

A completest is not really a completest.
We are nutters!
Logged
Best wishes,
Adam

Offline Tang Lung in Rome

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1332
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1271 on: October 07, 2013, 09:59:02 PM »
Logged

Offline skyjackers

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1006
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1272 on: October 08, 2013, 05:36:53 AM »
Does your camera have a white balance? You go to the trouble of making these videos that it seems a shame not to have the camera set up properly.
Logged

Offline Simes

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2870
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1273 on: October 08, 2013, 05:44:45 AM »
To be frank, I am really not 'getting' the point of indecisive shakey cam wanderings around and over a poster in sepia colour.

Just scan the image and pop it up.

I've stopped looking at these some time ago... sorry.
Logged

Offline Silence

  • Hobbyist
  • **
  • Posts: 140
Re: James Bond
« Reply #1274 on: October 08, 2013, 09:26:23 AM »
I've never even bothered to look.
Logged
MICHAEL
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53 ... 88   Go Up
« previous next »