Author Topic: Original & Later Re-release Posters (Read 21406 times)

brude · « **Reply #25 on:** July 18, 2012, 12:06:21 PM »

I knew this one, but the line "A Columbia Reprint" is a dead giveaway.

paul waines · « **Reply #26 on:** July 21, 2012, 10:29:47 AM »

So as I can now do this...

Here's a First release Brides Quad

And the 61/2 re-release...

Ari · « **Reply #27 on:** July 21, 2012, 10:34:05 AM »

Ahhhh Shuddup, your just jealous of the superior Australian paper (this was actually banned here until the 70's - dag nab it)

paul waines · « **Reply #28 on:** July 21, 2012, 10:41:56 AM »

Was that Vampire image also used on the House of Dracula Daybill...?

I seem to have seen it elsewhere..

Ari · « **Reply #29 on:** July 21, 2012, 10:21:56 PM »

yeah I think so, shocking, possibly scarier than the movie!

paul waines · « **Reply #30 on:** July 25, 2012, 12:09:43 PM »

It's always a bit annoying Poor David Peel doesn't get a mention on, even the re-release poster....

Zorba · « **Reply #31 on:** July 25, 2012, 08:58:32 PM »

Quote from: paul waines on July 21, 2012, 10:29:47 AM

So as I can now do this...

Here's a First release Brides Quad

And the 61/2 re-release...

Somebody stole their colors.

Cheap bastards.

Ari · « **Reply #32 on:** July 25, 2012, 11:02:13 PM »

it's a shame they didn't just do in black and white, I reckon it would look great. (maybe red text)

Zorba · « **Reply #33 on:** July 25, 2012, 11:14:33 PM »

Quote from: Ari on July 25, 2012, 11:02:13 PM

it's a shame they didn't just do in black and white, I reckon it would look great. (maybe red text)

I agree it would be better than the green.

I think it is a pretty cool poster but not near as much when next to the original.

wonka · « **Reply #34 on:** July 26, 2012, 01:07:16 AM »

Quote from: theartofmovieposters on May 21, 2012, 12:24:57 AM

Oof.

Ari · « **Reply #35 on:** July 26, 2012, 01:32:02 AM »

Maybe stretching a bit, as some of these are 2nd run posters rather than reissues.

And this was banned in OZ until the 70's

when we got this

paul waines · « **Reply #36 on:** July 26, 2012, 01:53:08 AM »

Ari, is that Curse of Frankenstein saying it was released in Black & White before??

Ari · « **Reply #37 on:** July 26, 2012, 01:56:20 AM »

No, first time a FRANKENSTEIN film was in colour.

brude · « **Reply #38 on:** July 26, 2012, 02:03:36 AM »

Quote from: Ari on July 26, 2012, 01:32:02 AM

What's worse than David Peel getting no credit on a BRIDES OF DRACULA quad?
Caroline Munro not getting one on this daybill.

Oh, the horror...

Ari · « **Reply #39 on:** July 26, 2012, 02:06:06 AM »

It's OK, I have a thick black pen to fix that up.

paul waines · « **Reply #40 on:** September 27, 2012, 11:32:30 AM »

Mind, she looks great in any colour does Caroline...

Dread_Pirate_Mel · « **Reply #41 on:** October 08, 2012, 04:07:26 PM »

Big Heat - 1953 first release on left, 1959 re-release on right. At first glance they seem identical but closer inspection reveals that the 1959 version was completely redrawn:

Charlie · « **Reply #42 on:** October 08, 2012, 04:49:37 PM »

And her dress is missing... And they still didn't add the arm.

erik1925 · « **Reply #43 on:** October 08, 2012, 07:13:10 PM »

Quote from: Charlie on October 08, 2012, 04:49:37 PM

And her dress is missing... And they still didn't add the arm.

Seems they added it in, on the Spanish version

:

erik1925 · « **Reply #44 on:** November 01, 2012, 12:08:58 AM »

THE MUMMY'S CURSE (Universal - 1944); US OS

Gotta love how they opened and lowered her neckline on the Realart re-release

110x75 · « **Reply #45 on:** November 01, 2012, 11:23:18 AM »

Quote from: erik1925 on November 01, 2012, 12:08:58 AM

Gotta love how they opened and lowered her neckline on the Realart re-release

That's what I call improvement

erik1925 · « **Reply #46 on:** November 01, 2012, 12:36:49 PM »

Quote from: 110x75 on November 01, 2012, 11:23:18 AM

That's what I call improvement

Matias.. looks like they gave her implants, too!

Dread_Pirate_Mel · « **Reply #47 on:** January 20, 2013, 09:25:02 AM »

50th Anniversary Cassie crushes the original:

brude · « **Reply #48 on:** January 20, 2013, 11:35:46 PM »

I'm not much of a fan of the WB art dept., but the original speaks to it's era which makes it infinitely better than any modern-age interpretation, IMO.

Dread_Pirate_Mel · « **Reply #49 on:** April 13, 2013, 03:51:41 PM »

Little Mermaid: 1997rr (below right) is better than the 1989 first release IMO:

News:

Author Topic: Original & Later Re-release Posters (Read 21406 times)

Dread_Pirate_Mel

Charlie

Dread_Pirate_Mel

Dread_Pirate_Mel