I had been intermittently watching this thread, wanting to let the new members with salient points regarding Lieberman's business practice drive the discussion and get to the heart of the matter. To 50's and Zorba, there are many, many more people whose conclusion about cinemasterpieces is the same as yours than there are those who defend his business practice. We've just done this many times already on NSFGE with threads calling him out and with his ultimately scrambling to put a spin on things to do damage control.
But I'm starting to see things getting personal against the ones bringing up the issue by some more established collectors. Getting personal in arguments is Lieberman's tactic, not yours. If you want to be persuasive, use reasoning, lest you want to sink to his level and drive away the very people we've been trying to help on these forums. It is to Lieberman's advantage to have you do his work for him and intimidate away collectors who ask probing and revealing questions that unravel his business schemes.
As for those defending the general business practice of selling something for whatever price you want, that's not the issue. I always see this argument as a defense, mostly by dealers or by collectors who sell. It seems to me that this occurs because dealers and sellers start to worry that this issue will project onto them or the criticism will transfer to them and thus start to affect the prices they set in their own business. This discussion, or any of the other prior discussions about Lieberman, isn't about you or any other dealer or seller. It's about cinemasterpieces and his business practice. If other dealers and sellers, who don't do what Lieberman does but who always interject with the "I have the right to sell whatever I want" argument, can remember that it isn't about you, you'll see what 50's and Zorba are trying to get at.
And this whole "buyer beware" and it's "all ultimately the buyer's responsibility" schtick.... There's an essay on this one. But I'm going to leave it at this for now: If this were completely true, there would be no legal accountability for fraud or false advertisement and the swindling of people out of their money through lying business schemes. And none of us would have any grounds to complain about bootleg posters or anything fake at all. Not the least of which is the recent Universal Horror posters scam. It's the buyers' fault for being taken in, correct? It's the new collector's responsibility for recognizing false advertisement about the rarity and investment quality of a poster, right? It's a good thing people who care about truth and authenticity don't think this way, or else there'd be no movie poster forum or movie poster authenticating site....
I'd add more in this thread, but I have two deadlines to meet, one of them with April 15th.
But, I do want to draw everyone's attention to the most enlightening Doh! statement in this thread, the one that made me want to sing hallelujah, light firecrackers and get jiggywithit:
Dave can do what Dave wants.. as long as he isn't stealing, perpetuating fraud or driving my car..
Wow, that pretty much sums up Dave Lieberman to a T. Nice work, Rich. You've managed to summarize over six years worth of issues regarding Lieberman in one sentence.
Jeannie