Movie Posters > Posters By Country

Italian posters : Printers and Dates

(1/3) > >>

Tang Lung in Rome:
Vecchioni 1959-64 : Monroe SLIH 2sh , 007 FRWL 2sh

Policrom 1965-66 : Eastwood FAF$M , 007 TB , Dracula PoD

Novograph 1972-73 : What's Up Doc locandina , Fist of Fury 2sh (both styles , also red Titanus logos)

Rotograph 1969-74 : Easy Rider bustas , Owl and Pussycat bustas , Lee's BB/FoF/WotD bustas , Death Wish bustas

Rotopress

Sericolor




Tang Lung in Rome:
Rotograph 1968-74 : OUATITV vertical pb

Vecchioni and Guadagno : Great Escape vertical pb

Novograph 1971-73 : Scars Dracula 2sh

Rotolito : 007 R65 DN 4sh

Rotolitografica : 007 TSWLM pb

Rotopress : 007 TSWLM 4sh , Lee R70s BB/FoF/WotD/EtD

Tang Lung in Rome:
Goldfinger 1st issue , Rotolito or P. Ragioni.......OHMSS was P. Ragioni I believe ?

erik1925:
Does anyone have info on the printer, A.P.E. Roma, and when they might have been in business?

I found some info that suggests they did posters in the 1930's and 40s but don't know how thorough that time frame is.



erik1925:
I tripped across these...kind of interesting...

HA sold a pair of photobustas for GWTW, in 2010. They are described as being from 1948. What is interesting is that 1948 also appears on the lower right corner of each piece. But imdb suggests that GWTW didnt first play in Italy until 1951.

http://movieposters.ha.com/itm/academy-award-winner/gone-with-the-wind-mgm-1948-italian-photobustas-2-185-x-26-academy-award-winners-total-2-items-/a/510072-52185.s#57445744658

However, when I was looking closely at these, something immediately popped off the page that says these are most likely from the early 1970s. And that was the MGM logo (leo the lion) used on both. This logo was created and used by MGM starting in the 1960s thru 1982, for their film posters. The distributor, CIC, was started in the early 1970s by Paramount and Universal.

In 1973, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer closed down its distribution offices and became a partner in CIC, which took over international distribution for MGM's films.

So is the 1948 more likely a code or cataloging number of some kind?






Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version