« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Rare, but not valuable  (Read 17564 times)

Offline brude

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 13565
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #25 on: April 25, 2012, 04:05:52 PM »
Goona Goona...the real deal...even mentions filmmaker Armand Denis.

http://www.etsy.com/listing/57188191/goona-goona-powder-famous-hoodoo-powder
Logged

Mikewarrior

  • Guest
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #26 on: April 25, 2012, 05:00:13 PM »
Quote from: brude on April 25, 2012, 04:05:52 PM
Goona Goona...the real deal...even mentions filmmaker Armand Denis.

http://www.etsy.com/listing/57188191/goona-goona-powder-famous-hoodoo-powder

That wouldn't make me happy... I hate dust so why would I want powder in my home?  :P
Logged

Offline theartofmovieposters

  • Collector
  • ***
  • Posts: 905
    • theartofmovieposters
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #27 on: April 25, 2012, 05:44:04 PM »
Some really nice stuff in this thread.
Logged
Ves

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #28 on: April 25, 2012, 06:31:02 PM »
Quote from: brude on April 25, 2012, 04:05:52 PM
Goona Goona...the real deal...even mentions filmmaker Armand Denis.

http://www.etsy.com/listing/57188191/goona-goona-powder-famous-hoodoo-powder

Ted, here's the chick selling that powder. I think she's been partaking of it, herself.  ;)



Speaking of rare- and she does say this item is rare-  it's called Witch's Butter. A fungus used to ward off hexes and curses. jawdrop

It's from the last harvest of the season:





« Last Edit: April 25, 2012, 06:37:25 PM by erik1925 »
Logged


-Jeff

Offline brude

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 13565
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #29 on: April 25, 2012, 06:33:20 PM »
Quote from: erik1925 on April 25, 2012, 06:31:02 PM
Ted, here's the chick selling that powder. I think she's been partaking of it, herself.  ;)





Wonder if it did that to her hair?
Wouldn't work on my clean-shaven noggin though....
Logged

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9038
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #30 on: April 26, 2012, 01:30:42 PM »
I thought I had a few more of these on my computer, so here they are...















« Last Edit: April 03, 2016, 02:28:35 PM by erik1925 »
Logged
It's more than a Hobby...

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #31 on: April 26, 2012, 01:36:10 PM »
Great stuff, Paul!  thumbup


Logged


-Jeff

Offline 110x75

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2942
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #32 on: April 26, 2012, 02:43:11 PM »
That's a quite interesting historical document over there Paul. You should be given the number one UK poster history caretaker medal.  thumbup
Logged
Matias
http://110x75.blogspot.com.ar/

IG: @cinepapelarchivo

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9038
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #33 on: April 26, 2012, 03:22:18 PM »
I think I do a better job than the BFI..... ;)
Logged
It's more than a Hobby...

Offline brude

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 13565
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #34 on: April 26, 2012, 03:58:32 PM »
Quote from: paul waines on April 26, 2012, 03:22:18 PM
I think I do a better job than the BFI..... ;)

I'll bet you do.
 cheers
Logged

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #35 on: April 19, 2014, 06:22:10 PM »
I picked this up last summer from a small advertised auction in the midwest. It's an unfolded US HS for the Merle Oberon film, Beloved Enemy (1936). When trying to find comparables on this style, the only thing I found was that HA had auctioned it 3 times. Thing is, all three auctions were for this same, identical copy (the same water staining & minor paper loss, in the lower right corner, was the identifier).

I've not seen it on ebay and emovie has also not sold one before. So is is more rare? Maybe. It isn't something I can retire on. But I've always had a soft spot for Merle Oberon, ever since seeing her in Wuthering Heights (1939), in a high school English class, when we screened the film, after reading the book.  ;)

« Last Edit: April 02, 2016, 01:19:51 AM by erik1925 »
Logged


-Jeff

Offline Zorba

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6024
  • Lets dance!
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #36 on: April 19, 2014, 07:07:35 PM »
Very cool Jeff.
Logged

Offline Starling

  • Collector
  • ***
  • Posts: 738
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #37 on: April 21, 2014, 12:07:35 AM »
Gorgeous portrait of Merle, Jeff. I think it should be more valuable :)
Logged

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #38 on: April 21, 2014, 12:15:37 AM »
Thanks, Brian... I've seen the OS and some other items for this.. (glass slides, LC, stills) and I think this HS works quite well. She looks gorgeous and is SO present in the HS format (or at least I think so).  :)
Logged


-Jeff

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #39 on: April 01, 2016, 08:55:51 PM »
Dont know if this is maybe just a bit more uncommon? (rather than rare), but I haven't come across another one.

Paul, have you seen a number of these float by? Being from 1987, one would think there would be a good number about?

UK quad for Near Dark

« Last Edit: April 01, 2016, 08:57:31 PM by erik1925 »
Logged


-Jeff

Offline rdavey26

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2327
    • Randy's Movie Posterz
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #40 on: April 02, 2016, 12:53:09 AM »
That Near Dark Quad looks like the one that was on ebay not to long ago that went for somewhere in the $30 range. Is that the one Jeff and if so are you the one that ended up winning the auction??
Logged

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #41 on: April 02, 2016, 01:02:02 AM »
Quote from: rdavey26 on April 02, 2016, 12:53:09 AM
That Near Dark Quad looks like the one that was on ebay not to long ago that went for somewhere in the $30 range. Is that the one Jeff and if so are you the one that ended up winning the auction??

Hey Randy-

I did get my copy off the bay, but it was back in 2013.

So another popped up more recently?

Edit: From Feb 1 of this year (2016):

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Near-Dark-UK-quad-poster-original-horror-one-sheet-/281919122640?hash=item41a3b06cd0%3Ag%3AcdQAAOSw5dNWpkUx&nma=true&si=ocSg3mLfUOenmUIMn15064xYyko%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

« Last Edit: April 02, 2016, 01:14:36 AM by erik1925 »
Logged


-Jeff

Offline rdavey26

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2327
    • Randy's Movie Posterz
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #42 on: April 02, 2016, 01:19:53 AM »
Logged

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #43 on: April 02, 2016, 01:22:56 AM »
I got my copy from a seller in the UK.

IMHO, the quad art blows the US OS away. On the US paper, it looks like the actor was hit with a face full of mud.   Doh.gif
« Last Edit: April 02, 2016, 01:25:52 AM by erik1925 »
Logged


-Jeff

Offline rdavey26

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2327
    • Randy's Movie Posterz
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #44 on: April 02, 2016, 01:35:44 AM »
I agree the US OS is garbage. Love the artwork on the Quad. Been wanting one for awhile now and it keeps eluding me. One day I shall have one. There are still a few others I am after as well and every time they pop up for auction I forget about them or have to work.
Logged

Offline Severen

  • Hobbyist
  • **
  • Posts: 151
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #45 on: April 02, 2016, 02:45:33 AM »
I always thought this OS was cool for it.
Logged

Offline Severen

  • Hobbyist
  • **
  • Posts: 151
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #46 on: April 02, 2016, 02:49:16 AM »
Here is one of mine that I consider "rare" but not necessarily valuable

Logged

Offline Severen

  • Hobbyist
  • **
  • Posts: 151
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #47 on: April 02, 2016, 02:52:42 AM »
This one as well

Logged

Offline rdavey26

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2327
    • Randy's Movie Posterz
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #48 on: April 02, 2016, 03:00:27 AM »
I want that Monster Squad Severen. You ready to sell it yet lol.
Logged

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9038
Re: Rare, but not valuable
« Reply #49 on: April 02, 2016, 07:25:06 AM »
Yep, liking that Monster Squad... it may just have gone up a few Dollars. ;)
Logged
It's more than a Hobby...
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »