Author Topic: Future Classics  (Read 7531 times)

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Future Classics
« Reply #25 on: August 02, 2016, 11:36:24 PM »
Even that is not so easy.  Some of the better posters from the last few years are from pretty lousy movies.  Nurse, Rubber, The Great and Powerful OZ as examples.  All good posters.  The movies not so much.

I think a poster needs to have some of each to be a classic.

Agreed. If the movie is a real stinker, no matter how good the poster, it might still not ever achieve that "classic" status.


-Jeff

Offline erik1925

  • Post-aholic
  • **********
  • Posts: 20330
Re: Future Classics
« Reply #26 on: August 02, 2016, 11:47:23 PM »


I`ll take a guess at this.

Stew

Hey Stew.. what was this one?

Do you remember?   ;)
« Last Edit: August 03, 2016, 03:57:42 PM by erik1925 »


-Jeff

Offline oldposterho

  • Collector
  • ***
  • Posts: 646
    • Peter's Movie Posters
Re: Future Classics
« Reply #27 on: August 03, 2016, 09:24:16 AM »
Some of the better posters from the last few years are from pretty lousy movies.  Nurse, Rubber, The Great and Powerful OZ as examples.  All good posters.  The movies not so much.

A bit OT, but if you want a very interesting movie experience first watch Oz, The Great and Powerful (which I liked), then the '39 Wizard of Oz, followed by Walter Murch's Return to Oz.

The coolest inadvertent trilogy evah.
For sale and trade posters: *Here*