The posters were returned to the consignor today, at my expense. As expected, when we removed them from under the 100 pounds of weight covering them they were still curling, and it surely would have taken another month or more for them to completely flatten.
I am strongly considering no longer taking low value rolled posters at all. They are a huge money loser for us. Then we won't have these kinds of issues at all.
I concur.
Your compensation for covering the shipping is something I am greatful but I didn't require. So Thank You.
Bruce, I imagine your goal is to prevent posters under $356 in your new considerations. That is considering one of the posters I sent was recently sold on your site for that value. Now thats the max it's sold for in "Very Good". Even at lower quality which mine was at min, good to very good, that's still higher value.
It would be sad to loose a large majority of your rolled one sheet auctions to that sort of limit. But hey, I don't deny the majority of the posters I sent were under that value. But that's why you glady accept bulk lots per your site.
You did the highlighting not me, you preach one thing but publicly to the consumer still accept another. In fact if this is such a "loss" for you, why had your page stated the same thing since, 2011? 5 years now you've been gladly accepting losses for yourself on behalf of another. That's a long time to "gladly" accept a loss. I appreciate the loss you take for peons such as myself, that's what makes you're site different than the rest as you've said.
https://web.archive.org/web/20111019070011/http://www.emovieposter.com/learnmore/?page=consignIf you consider $356 low value, boy I'd love to have your income.
So here's to the next chapter in another life!
