John, are all of these most recent posters offset printing? They all have a very similar look, printing wise, with some alomost looking like stone lithos. The colors really pop, that's for sure.
The method of printing and general design on many of these posters helps to ID them (country), as many have a similar look and style, production and art-wise.Would that be safe to say, John?
Seems that so many of your posts highlighting Egyptian and Iranian films are human dramas.Do either of these countries have any history of horror or science fiction films that you can elaborate upon?Not that I'm complaining, mind you.Just curious.
Fair enough Darvish, you have a point. This said, watermark is indeed a cheap (free) solution and ugly. Google "invisible watermark"... For a small price, you can get a software that hide invisible watermark on pictures as well as a tool to monitors the web.(y)
Invisible watermarks are a bit useless IMO. The images can all still end up in a book like happened above and Google's search won't find it if in a book. Also if Google notifies you your imaze was found on xyz website , the website owner might say get stuffed... Are you going to take them to court about it? Especially when a photo of just the poster you can't copyright as the image is someone else's.Sadly, sticking a visible watermark on is the better of invisible one
Thanks for posting some horror, John -- that Bloodtide poster is striking.