All Poster Forum Also visit the All Poster Blog
May 24, 2012, 06:16:09 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: To Live and Die in L.A. question(s)  (Read 898 times)
Zorba
Curator
*****
Posts: 2084


Lets dance!


View Profile
« on: April 26, 2010, 06:05:10 PM »

I recently picked up an original(?) To Live and Die in L.A. one sheet. I have some newbie questions.

1) It doesnt quite reach the full 27 x 41. It comes up 1/16 short on both measurements. I understood that that is within reason. Is that true?

2) It is rolled. Was this common in 1985?

3) The NSS number on the lower right seems messy to me. A little smudged. None of my other NSS posters have that. Was that something that happened?

4) There is a little bit of what I assume is ink bleed thru on the top back. I havent seen this before either. Common  Shocked?

5) Is this a poster that got the repro treatment?

6) Am I being paranoid ?...because Im pretty sure I have a movie goods poster?
« Last Edit: April 26, 2010, 07:54:24 PM by Zorba » Logged

Zorba
Curator
*****
Posts: 2084


Lets dance!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2010, 08:24:54 PM »

Not everyone all at once.   laugh

 

Logged

wonka
Guest
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2010, 08:33:14 PM »

Zorba, I meant to post here the other day, but had to go.

Is there anyway you can post a picture?  That would really help.

But even without seeing it, I would venture to say that you are in the clear.

I say this because:

1/16th of an inch off is not really cause for concern in this case.  Several posters from this era can be off by around that amount and be ok.  Not all "41 inches long" one sheets are on the dot in terms of precise measurements.

Rolled is the exception rather than the rule for most posters before the late 80s, but they can be found, some easier than others...depends on the title.

I have NSS text to be more smudged than others on some posters, all legit pieces.

Again, I am about 99% sure...if you can post a pic that would really help.

Logged
eatbrie
Administrator
Curator
*****
Posts: 4123



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2010, 08:36:49 PM »

1) True.
2) Not common, but not uncommon either.
3) Check the pic... all versions seem to be like this.
4) It happens.
5) I don't know, but Moviegoods posters (to my understanding) are really easy to spot.
6) Maybe.

T

Logged

Poster Website

- Holiday, I like you and respect you but you are probably the worst violator of all.
- Ted (dumbass Conservative): "Most Conservatives don't like to be labeled and personally attacked." - Thierry (brainwashed Liberal) (derisive): Really?  - Ted (dumbass Conservative): "Yeah, really, you smug bastard."

- I wish to thank all APF members for being part of the World's Largest Social Gathering of Movie Poster Collectors
- "Wishing you the best of luck with All Poster Forum and in encouraging others to appreciate the magical art of film posters" - Martin Scorsese (2009)
Zorba
Curator
*****
Posts: 2084


Lets dance!


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2010, 08:49:58 PM »

Thanks guys!...I really do appreciate the help. I feel much better about it now.  Smiley

This is a cool place but reading this forum( a little knowledge can be dangerous in the wrong hands) makes me wonder about every poster I have Tongue

 APF = sm1



Logged

ddilts399
Curator
*****
Posts: 1061



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2010, 06:22:16 AM »

Normally the paper moviegoods uses will give away the poster as a reprint no matter how good the source image was. It is normally a heavier paper, which would not match up to 80's paper at all.
Logged
Zorba
Curator
*****
Posts: 2084


Lets dance!


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2010, 04:30:38 PM »

Normally the paper moviegoods uses will give away the poster as a reprint no matter how good the source image was. It is normally a heavier paper, which would not match up to 80's paper at all.

The paper seems good as it mostly matches up to the others I have from same period.


There is one thing about the surface. Its rougher where the ink is black than the lighter colored areas.


I would have posted a full pic but it looks like the one T posted and I dont have a good camera(YET).
This is the bleed thru? I mentioned.





Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SMF customization services by 2by2host.com
Chat Software with Forum Hosting and and FTP Hosting powered by OLI
Forum owner/admin: Holiday Russell