This isn't the first time I've disagreed with Bruce, and I'm sure it won't be the last. Full respect for him, but I've seen unused ones, AND I've actually had one or two that have come from a theater, used with pin holes, tape, mold, etc.
It was definitely used internationally. Is it possible they are from a late 60's or 70's international re release?
I've dealt with Matt at Filmart many, many times over the years and although I can't say I know him well, I do know from speaking with him that he likes to stay out of any potential controversies and prefers to not comment publicly. If you think about it, most movie poster dealers are like that.
I think Kirby at movieart once commented on these on mopo. If he did maybe someone can dig up what he said about them? or maybe it was someone else, I really don't remember.
If they are really fakes/repros.....then why all the blatant differences? Why has every one I've ever seen been folded. Surely a few fake rolled ones would have surfaced if they were indeed fakes. It doesn't make sense.
Same thing goes for that Woodstock one sheet. I don't care what mpgrading says about it with their paper age acidity test. BTW I have full respect for Todd and what he is doing at mpgrading and for the hobby, but I do not think the test is always accurate. Same goes for Bruce, he is awesome, I just disagree with him every now and then.