Author Topic: James Bond  (Read 625266 times)

Dread_Pirate_Mel

  • Guest
Re: James Bond
« Reply #500 on: April 12, 2011, 10:05:19 PM »
So this YOLT Japanese poster sold for $489 tonight.  Who can spot something WRONG about this poster?

(Don't post an answer until tomorrow - let everyone think about it)


Bruce

  • Guest
Re: James Bond
« Reply #501 on: April 12, 2011, 10:09:31 PM »
Is it that you didn't Photoshop out the watermark?

Bruce

Dread_Pirate_Mel

  • Guest
Re: James Bond
« Reply #502 on: April 12, 2011, 10:12:53 PM »
Is it that you didn't Photoshop out the watermark?

Bruce

Now, now, Bruce, it's nothing to do with the condition of the poster.  It's something in the design, which is probably why it went for so much....

Offline wonka

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2183
  • Reverend of the APF
Re: James Bond
« Reply #503 on: April 12, 2011, 11:00:58 PM »
It's very obvious, but probably not the reason it went for so high.
"Ben. His name is Ben. But he's a Celtic fan, so Asshole will do too." -Thierry

Quote from: MoviePosterBid.com
I was mistaken,

Offline Zorba

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6024
  • Lets dance!
Re: James Bond
« Reply #504 on: April 12, 2011, 11:05:06 PM »
It's very obvious, but probably not the reason it went for so high.

Does it have anything to do with Crystal Gayle?

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #505 on: April 13, 2011, 06:30:56 AM »
So this YOLT Japanese poster sold for $489 tonight.  Who can spot something WRONG about this poster?

(Don't post an answer until tomorrow - let everyone think about it)

There's nothing wrong with the poster  eyeroll

The reason it went for that price is because of the missing words, IMO.
Bruce has sold, I think, only one of these before.

Now, now, Bruce, it's nothing to do with the condition of the poster.

I can't see where Bruce mentioned the condition of the poster.

hey gang, has anyone seen bruces auction of the YOLT quad, style c
anyways as iv never had one of these in hand it says trimmed now measures 30x40.. shouldnt this poster measure 30x40 in the 1st place?
thanks

jon

In answer to Jonny's question, and to support Terry, Paul & Matt's responses, my YOLT Style C quad measures 31x41".
Best wishes,
Adam

Online 50s

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5630
  • Steve
Re: James Bond
« Reply #506 on: April 13, 2011, 06:56:24 AM »
Is it that you didn't Photoshop out the watermark?

Bruce

Now, now, Bruce, it's nothing to do with the condition of the poster.  It's something in the design, which is probably why it went for so much....

I can't see where Bruce mentioned the condition of the poster.

I was thinking that too, but let it pass... a digital watermark has nothing to do with the condition of a poster. I like Bruces double meaning humour tho.

I think Mel needs to now un now now his now now to Bruce


Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #507 on: April 13, 2011, 08:32:08 AM »
I think Mel needs to now un now now his now now to Bruce

Lol. It wouldn't be the first time a post is deleted, or altered, Steve. ;)

Anyway, I received the below today:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Diamonds-Forever-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-007-Poster-/350451600436?pt=UK_DVD_Film_TV_Film_Memorabilia_LE&hash=item51988b0c34#ht_500wt_922

Condition is about right (as per description in the auction).
This poster is yet another example of when a piece looks better in person.
Best wishes,
Adam

Dread_Pirate_Mel

  • Guest
Re: James Bond
« Reply #508 on: April 13, 2011, 09:02:11 AM »
Wow, that is cool, Adam, congrats on getting that Diamonds are Forever quad:



So why do the 1967 Japanese posters have his eyes blue but the 1976rr has them brown?

And why is the tagline "Sean Connery is James Bond" missing from the Emovie B2?

1967 posters







1976 poster:



Offline joneyyy

  • Collector
  • ***
  • Posts: 538
Re: James Bond
« Reply #509 on: April 13, 2011, 09:29:13 AM »
adz did you get the double crowns as well?

Bruce

  • Guest
Re: James Bond
« Reply #510 on: April 13, 2011, 09:48:44 AM »
Mel

I knew that was what you were driving at, but didn't want to spoil your game.

We noticed the same thing, and so we contacted Bond experts and Japanese poster experts, and all either responded "Both are original" or "Don't know".

Bruce

Offline wonka

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 2183
  • Reverend of the APF
Re: James Bond
« Reply #511 on: April 13, 2011, 10:16:04 AM »
The eyes have it.
"Ben. His name is Ben. But he's a Celtic fan, so Asshole will do too." -Thierry

Quote from: MoviePosterBid.com
I was mistaken,

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #512 on: April 13, 2011, 10:16:23 AM »
adz did you get the double crowns as well?

No, I didn't mate.
I couldn't justify over £600 for DCs that I have seen come up for sale on three or four occasions in the last two years.
The quad, on the other hand, I have personally never seen come up for sale.
I am sure it was one person who won all 4 of the DCs.
I pipped that same person to the quad - to be honest, I was actually very surprised it didn't go for more!
My max bid was a bit more than £421!

So why do the 1967 Japanese posters have his eyes blue but the 1976rr has them brown?
And why is the tagline "Sean Connery is James Bond" missing from the Emovie B2?

I don't know the definite answers to those questions, but to echo Bruce's comments - I said it is probably an original; the only thing that is missing are the words 'Sean Connery Is James Bond'.
Best wishes,
Adam

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9038
Re: James Bond
« Reply #513 on: April 13, 2011, 11:00:29 AM »
Sean Connery is James Bond only appeared on first release posters. After that Connery didn't want his name, and the suggestion that he IS James Bond on the posters, as by then a different actor was playing the part. So it is quite often missing on re-release posters. Some  first release Quads that were re-used for re-releases had a sticker placed over the IS so it read Connery AS James Bond. Which was a compromise, Connery and the studios came too, when the films were re-issued.
It's more than a Hobby...

Offline joneyyy

  • Collector
  • ***
  • Posts: 538
Re: James Bond
« Reply #514 on: April 13, 2011, 11:03:22 AM »
answer is....

what paul just said.

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #515 on: April 13, 2011, 12:04:46 PM »
Sean Connery is James Bond only appeared on first release posters. After that Connery didn't want his name, and the suggestion that he IS James Bond on the posters, as by then a different actor was playing the part. So it is quite often missing on re-release posters. Some  first release Quads that were re-used for re-releases had a sticker placed over the IS so it read Connery AS James Bond. Which was a compromise, Connery and the studios came too, when the films were re-issued.

Yeah, Connery's decision not to be associated solely with the Bond franchise is something fairly well-known in Bond circles, but for me this poster is difficult because it is pretty much exactly the same as the true, original release as it were, so if this is a re-release then it must be a very early one ... Do you know what the exact date is, Paul? Would it potentially be late '60s?
Best wishes,
Adam

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9038
Re: James Bond
« Reply #516 on: April 13, 2011, 12:34:04 PM »
I must be a bit slow here, it has been one of those days... which poster do you not know the date of Adam? can you post a pic...
It's more than a Hobby...

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #517 on: April 13, 2011, 12:55:30 PM »
Best wishes,
Adam

Offline paul waines

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9038
Re: James Bond
« Reply #518 on: April 13, 2011, 03:06:22 PM »
Oh right, I see the problem. It looks first release to me, bar the missing Connery tag.... I'm not a betting Man, but I would bet on it being  first release. The UA logo changed in 68 and I cannot see them re-releaseing it again 6 months later...
It's more than a Hobby...

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #519 on: April 13, 2011, 03:54:53 PM »
Oh right, I see the problem. It looks first release to me, bar the missing Connery tag.... I'm not a betting Man, but I would bet on it being  first release. The UA logo changed in 68 and I cannot see them re-releaseing it again 6 months later...

That's what I thought, Paul.
Cheers!  ;D
Best wishes,
Adam

Offline Zorba

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6024
  • Lets dance!
Re: James Bond
« Reply #520 on: April 13, 2011, 04:50:06 PM »
Oh right, I see the problem. It looks first release to me, bar the missing Connery tag.... I'm not a betting Man, but I would bet on it being  first release. The UA logo changed in 68 and I cannot see them re-releaseing it again 6 months later...

The dating system Armin has on his site for Japanese posters would confirm this....the poster is using Showa which means 42=67

http://www.posteroid.com/Poster%20Info%20Folder/Determining%20a%20poster's%20age.php

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #521 on: April 13, 2011, 05:05:29 PM »
The dating system Armin has on his site for Japanese posters would confirm this....the poster is using Showa which means 42=67

http://www.posteroid.com/Poster%20Info%20Folder/Determining%20a%20poster's%20age.php

THANK YOU FOR THIS!
I completely forgot about Armin!  hitself
Best wishes,
Adam

Offline Ari

  • Curator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8495
    • OFFALEATERS HOUSE OF THE DAMNED
Re: James Bond
« Reply #522 on: April 13, 2011, 08:23:34 PM »

I completely forgot about Armin! 

BOOO!
An Error Has Occurred!
You can't report your own post to the moderator, that doesn't make sense!

Offline Tang Lung in Rome

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1332
Re: James Bond
« Reply #523 on: April 13, 2011, 10:09:42 PM »
RIP Ruby.....now 2 of Blofelds patients are gone  :'(

Scoular In Suspected Suicide

13 hours ago | WENN | See recent WENN news »

British actress Angela Scoular died after allegedly drinking poisonous chemicals in a suspected suicide attempt, according to a U.K. report.

The wife of comedian Leslie Phillips was taken to hospital on Monday after paramedics were called to deal with an emergency at the couple's London home. Doctors were unable to save her and she was later pronounced dead.

Police are treating her death as "unexplained" and detectives are currently investigating.

Reports suggest the former Bond girl, 65, who had been suffering from bowel cancer, took her own life by ingesting toxic chemicals, while Carry On star Phillips admits his wife was struggling to deal with her illness.

He tells Britain's Daily Mail, "I didn't know she was going to take her own life. I suspected that it was a possibility because she had gone under, into this deep sadness. She had had a ghastly time.

"She never got free of the illness. I felt very sorry for her. Other illnesses had started to creep in. After three years of cancer she was always getting something else.

"She did her best but it got her down. Cancer takes you to the lowest places. It's a very tough thing to live with. She was weakened by the cancer and then depressed, deeply depressed. She was all over the place." »

Offline AdamCarterJones

  • Hoarder
  • ****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: James Bond
« Reply #524 on: April 15, 2011, 10:30:45 AM »
RIP Ruby.....now 2 of Blofelds patients are gone  :'(
Scoular In Suspected Suicide
British actress Angela Scoular died after allegedly drinking poisonous chemicals in a suspected suicide attempt, according to a U.K. report.

I am sure some of us here met her - she was a very nice woman and I was shocked to say the least when I heard of what had happened.
Sad day.

BOOO!

Yes, I know! Stupid me! hitself

Anyway...

... Most of us know there are two versions of the 'Happy Anniversary 007' US One Sheet: the MGM Theatrical version & the abc version, but has anyone else seen the third, VW version?

Any further info on this poster would be appreciated:


Happy Anniversary 007 US One Sheet VW version (notice the VW logo at the bottom left of the poster)



Above: Happy Anniversary 007 US One Sheet MGM theatrical version
Below: Happy Anniversary 007 US One Sheet abc version
Best wishes,
Adam